🎯 About this course
Fine-tuning is easy to start and hard to justify. This course focuses on the judgement and the evidence: when fine-tuning is the right tool, how LoRA/QLoRA make adaptation cheap, how to prepare leak-free instruction and preference data, and how to know whether a change actually helped.
You will build evaluation suites with programmatic graders, quantify uncertainty with Wilson intervals and paired bootstraps, calibrate LLM judges against human labels, and write release gates that protect critical slices. The applied studio has you fine-tune a small model for structured extraction and decide — honestly — whether to ship it.
👤Who it is for
Engineers and data scientists shipping LLM features who need to change models safely.
✨What makes it different
The graded labs need no GPU; the emphasis is on evaluation, statistics and decision-making, which is where most teams struggle.
By the end you will be able to
- Decide between prompting, retrieval and fine-tuning using a cost-, data- and evaluation-aware framework.
- Explain and implement LoRA/QLoRA, including parameter, memory and merge calculations.
- Prepare clean, leak-free instruction and preference datasets and compute preference-tuning objectives.
- Design task-specific evaluation suites with tagged cases, programmatic graders, slices and confidence intervals.
- Use LLM judges responsibly: write rubrics, detect position bias and measure agreement with humans.
- Build regression tests and release gates using paired statistical comparison and slice floors.
- Deliver an evidence-based ship / no-ship decision for a model change with cost, latency and rollback considerations.